Re: [QUESTION] Access to a huge GIT repository.

From: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 17, 2005, 10:36 UTC
Message-ID: <cda58cb80511170236p4a7e2baay@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511160837000.13959@g5.osdl.org>

Hi Linus

2005/11/16, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>:

Show 6 quoted lines

>
>
> First off, "rsync://" will never do what you want. It uses rsync
> (surprised surprise) to grab the objects, so since it has no clue what the
> objects are, it has no choice but to just grab them all.
>

yes that was a bad example, actually I've tried several protocol including git protocol.

> The fact that _some_ of the linux-mips repositories are based on mine
> makes me suspect that all their 2.6-based ones are rooted like mine is,
> but that may or may not be true.
>

hmm, don't think "linux mips" repository is rooted like yours. It seems that it has been imported from mips cvs repository which contains linux-mips history since 1995.

Show 6 quoted lines

> Just try your above command line with "git://" instead.
>
> (NOTE! Doing a full clone like the above is pretty expensive with git for
> the server side, so it might take a while before it starts feeding you
> stuff if it is under heavy load)
>

well I've already tried that but have renounced after waiting more than 4 hours ! I don't know if the server was under heavy load or if git protocol needs a lots of resources but it seems useless to setup a git dameon on it...

> If you want to get rid of other branches, do:

Sorry, I forget to tell that I have already tried what you suggested at first (except that I did not do a 'git repack -a -d') but it didn't work out (and that the reason why I tried the "kill father object" thing). Since I forgot the repack thing, I retried again, and it did last more than 4 hours to cpmplete all git commands. After that I run gitk --all to check that all old branch's objects have been removed but I can see all of them.

I plan to take look at git code to understand how object removal is done, but until this do you have any ideas why this fails ?

Thanks
--
               Franck