Re: [QUESTION] Access to a huge GIT repository.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 19, 2005, 20:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vu0e84bfq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <437F1E67.8020302@etek.chalmers.se>
Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se> writes:
> The "git-repack -a -d" case is fixed in Junios master, and I have sent out > a patch which lets you pipe git-fsck-objects --full --unreachable to > git-pack-redundant in the other cases, so the problem should hopefully > be resolved shortly.
After thinking a bit about it, I tend to agree with what Linus said, and would vote for the simplicity of the older way. From usage point of view, git-repack is primarily about repacking, and the -d option is a funny exception applicable to -a case, only because it is so obvious (i.e. after repacking everything into one, it is obvious any other packs are unneeded). We might even want to make the "-a" flag to imply "-a -d" there.