Re: [WIP] Shift rev-list enumeration from upload-pack to pack-objects
- From
- Nick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 7, 2009, 22:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <c77435a80906071504u16a46e03w6dfde9a3e694a5ec@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906071637530.3906@xanadu.home>
man I can sure be blind at times... alright fixed the latter two comments. I changed the test file because that particular test wanted upload-pack to fail through the revision walker, which it could only now do if shallow objects were involved.
@sam: oops, sorry about that.
From: Nick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] Shift object enumeration out of upload-pack
Offload object enumeration in upload-pack to pack-objects, but fall back on internal revision walker for shallow interaction. Test t5530 updated to reflect mechanism change.
Signed-off-by: Nick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com>
--- t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh | 2 +- upload-pack.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh index f5102b9..26bcd1e 100755 --- a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh +++ b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ test_expect_success 'fsck fails' ' test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in rev-list' ' ! echo "0032want $(git rev-parse HEAD) -00000009done +0034shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD^)00000009done 0000" | git upload-pack . > /dev/null 2> output.err && grep "waitpid (async) failed" output.err ' diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c index edc7861..397cada 100644 --- a/upload-pack.c +++ b/upload-pack.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static unsigned long oldest_have; static int multi_ack, nr_our_refs; static int use_thin_pack, use_ofs_delta, use_include_tag; static int no_progress; +static int shallow_nr; static struct object_array have_obj; static struct object_array want_obj; static unsigned int timeout; @@ -107,8 +108,6 @@ static int do_rev_list(int fd, void *create_full_pack) struct rev_info revs; pack_pipe = fdopen(fd, "w"); - if (create_full_pack) - use_thin_pack = 0; /* no point doing it */ init_revisions(&revs, NULL); revs.tag_objects = 1; revs.tree_objects = 1; @@ -155,13 +154,21 @@ static void create_pack_file(void) const char *argv[10]; int arg = 0; - rev_list.proc = do_rev_list; - /* .data is just a boolean: any non-NULL value will do */ - rev_list.data = create_full_pack ? &rev_list : NULL; - if (start_async(&rev_list)) - die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list"); + if (shallow_nr) { + rev_list.proc = do_rev_list; + rev_list.data = 0; + if (start_async(&rev_list)) + die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list"); + argv[arg++] = "pack-objects"; + } else { + argv[arg++] = "pack-objects"; + argv[arg++] = "--revs"; + if (create_full_pack) + argv[arg++] = "--all"; + else if (use_thin_pack) + argv[arg++] = "--thin"; + } - argv[arg++] = "pack-objects"; argv[arg++] = "--stdout"; if (!no_progress) argv[arg++] = "--progress"; @@ -172,7 +179,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(void) argv[arg++] = NULL; memset(&pack_objects, 0, sizeof(pack_objects)); - pack_objects.in = rev_list.out; /* start_command closes it */ + pack_objects.in = shallow_nr ? rev_list.out : -1; pack_objects.out = -1; pack_objects.err = -1; pack_objects.git_cmd = 1; @@ -181,6 +188,24 @@ static void create_pack_file(void) if (start_command(&pack_objects)) die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-pack-objects"); + /* pass on revisions we (don't) want */ + if (!shallow_nr) { + FILE *pipe_fd = fdopen(pack_objects.in, "w"); + if (!create_full_pack) { + int i; + for (i = 0; i < want_obj.nr; i++) + fprintf(pipe_fd, "%s\n", sha1_to_hex(want_obj.objects[i].item->sha1)); + fprintf(pipe_fd, "--not\n"); + for (i = 0; i < have_obj.nr; i++) + fprintf(pipe_fd, "%s\n", sha1_to_hex(have_obj.objects[i].item->sha1)); + } + + fprintf(pipe_fd, "\n"); + fflush(pipe_fd); + fclose(pipe_fd); + } + + /* We read from pack_objects.err to capture stderr output for * progress bar, and pack_objects.out to capture the pack data. */ @@ -276,7 +301,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(void) error("git upload-pack: git-pack-objects died with error."); goto fail; } - if (finish_async(&rev_list)) + if (shallow_nr && finish_async(&rev_list)) goto fail; /* error was already reported */ /* flush the data */ @@ -451,6 +476,7 @@ static void receive_needs(void) static char line[1000]; int len, depth = 0; + shallow_nr = 0; if (debug_fd) write_in_full(debug_fd, "#S\n", 3); for (;;) { @@ -534,6 +560,7 @@ static void receive_needs(void) packet_write(1, "shallow %s", sha1_to_hex(object->sha1)); register_shallow(object->sha1); + shallow_nr++; } result = result->next; } @@ -567,6 +594,8 @@ static void receive_needs(void) for (i = 0; i < shallows.nr; i++) register_shallow(shallows.objects[i].item->sha1); } + + shallow_nr += shallows.nr; free(shallows.objects); }
--
tg: (503f464..) t/revcache/upload-pack-dont-enumerate (depends on: master)
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Nicolas Pitre<nico@cam.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Nick Edelen wrote:
>
>> how does this look?
>
> Comments below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>> t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh | 2 +-
>> upload-pack.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
>> index f5102b9..26bcd1e 100755
>> --- a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
>> +++ b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ test_expect_success 'fsck fails' '
>> test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in rev-list' '
>>
>> ! echo "0032want $(git rev-parse HEAD)
>> -00000009done
>> +0034shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD^)00000009done
>
> Why did you modify this?
>
>> 0000" | git upload-pack . > /dev/null 2> output.err &&
>> grep "waitpid (async) failed" output.err
>> '
>> diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
>> index edc7861..c8f2dca 100644
>> --- a/upload-pack.c
>> +++ b/upload-pack.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static unsigned long oldest_have;
>> static int multi_ack, nr_our_refs;
>> static int use_thin_pack, use_ofs_delta, use_include_tag;
>> static int no_progress;
>> +static int shallow_nr;
>> static struct object_array have_obj;
>> static struct object_array want_obj;
>> static unsigned int timeout;
>> @@ -107,8 +108,6 @@ static int do_rev_list(int fd, void *create_full_pack)
>> struct rev_info revs;
>>
>> pack_pipe = fdopen(fd, "w");
>> - if (create_full_pack)
>> - use_thin_pack = 0; /* no point doing it */
>> init_revisions(&revs, NULL);
>> revs.tag_objects = 1;
>> revs.tree_objects = 1;
>> @@ -155,13 +154,22 @@ static void create_pack_file(void)
>> const char *argv[10];
>> int arg = 0;
>>
>> - rev_list.proc = do_rev_list;
>> - /* .data is just a boolean: any non-NULL value will do */
>> - rev_list.data = create_full_pack ? &rev_list : NULL;
>
> I'm glad you got rid of that.
>
>> - if (start_async(&rev_list))
>> - die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list");
>> + if (shallow_nr) {
>> + rev_list.proc = do_rev_list;
>> + rev_list.data = 0;
>> + if (start_async(&rev_list))
>> + die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list");
>> + argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
>> + } else {
>> + argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
>> + argv[arg++] = "--revs";
>> + argv[arg++] = "--include-tag";
>
> Why this unconditional --include-tags here? Isn't it handled already a
> couple lines down already?
>
>> + if (create_full_pack)
>> + argv[arg++] = "--all";
>> + if (use_thin_pack)
>> + argv[arg++] = "--thin";
>
> Please turn this "if (use_thin_pack)" into an "else if (use_thin_pack)"
> instead. No point using --thin for a full pack.
>
> The rest looks fine to me.
>
>
> Nicolas
>