Re: [PATCH 12/13] revert: Introduce skip-all to cleanup sequencer data
- From
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Date
- Jul 4, 2011, 04:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <buowrfy8wtt.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTimy17b-F7eg+R9ReRUrx0rhA1cumg@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
> Interesting side note: I'd initially wanted to use "skip_all" and > "continue", but "continue" is a C keyword. That's why I'd reluctantly > suffixed "_oper" to both for consistency.
It seems a good idea to restrict such uglification to only those cases where it's necessary, not make _everything_ ugly just for the sake of consistency.....
[The traditional thing to do with C-keyword conflicts, when there's no obvious and natural alternative, seems to just be intentional mispelling -- "continu", "kontinue", "cont", "_continue", whatever. Yes, they're ugly, but people will know why you did it, and they'll forgive you.]
-Miles
-- Helpmate, n. A wife, or bitter half.