Re: [PATCH 2/5] add object-cache infrastructure
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Sounds like a good thing to aim for, but "Object Cache" sounded too much
>> like giving access to the object data that is faster than either loose or
>> packed objects.
>
> Agreed. I'm open to better suggestions for the name. I would have just
> called it a straight out "cache" as it can be used for caching anything,
> but that term is already taken in git. :)
"Info Cache"? Even more generic, but avoids the loaded term "object"....
-miles
--
`Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'