Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] git-add: rename -u to -a
- From
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Date
- Feb 28, 2011, 09:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <buobp1w350a.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4D6B6101.9090504@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Miles Bader venit, vidit, dixit 28.02.2011 09:42: >> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: >>> - "commit -a,--add <addopts>" be "add <addopts> && commit", and >> >> Can you give an example? It look like you're proposing that the user >> would have to type "commit -a -u", which is pretty gross for a fairly >> common operation that already has a good shorthand... > > we don't need "-u" any more, because it's the new default. So, > obviously, "commit -a" would do what it always did.
Ok, so for "-u" that works out.
But for -A, the user would have to type "commit -a -A".
That sort of indirection is clever, but it seems confusing and inconvenient for the user, and I think a very common question would be "why do I need to use -a when it's obvious that -A should imply that?"
-miles
-- Vote, v. The instrument and symbol of a freeman's power to make a fool of himself and a wreck of his country.