Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] git-add: rename -u to -a
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Feb 28, 2011, 08:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4D6B6101.9090504@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <buomxlg35zq.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
Miles Bader venit, vidit, dixit 28.02.2011 09:42:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: >> - "commit -a,--add <addopts>" be "add <addopts> && commit", and > > Can you give an example? It look like you're proposing that the user > would have to type "commit -a -u", which is pretty gross for a fairly > common operation that already has a good shorthand...
Not again, please. I don't even know what to give an example for, given how much you cut down my post. In the last part of my post (the "radical" part), I explained why we don't need "-u" any more, because it's the new default. So, obviously (obvious from the parts you cut), "commit -a" would do what it always did.
And would you please try and follow our netiquete here? I had promised myself not to respond any more, but see how I'm still forgiving. Try and deserve it :)
Michael