Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #07; Wed, 28)
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 29, 2009, 12:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0901290420x1216a399w656e4d1622178a06@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090129115026.GB10792@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:50, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> I think that would be reasonable.
Yay :).
> It wouldn't help the case of "somebody > else pushed some content that you want to pull", but like you said, I > think the primary workflow is that you immediately push after cloning > the empty repo.
Also, the only way to support the "somebody else pushed already" workflow would be to assume the user wants to name the branch 'master', which might not be the case at all.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier