Re: [RFC] custom strategies in builtin-merge
- From
- Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 25, 2008, 11:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0807250450m25a932b8h68fcee13f8c343dc@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080725113316.GF32057@genesis.frugalware.org>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 13:33, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
> 1) Maintain a list of commands that has a git-merge- prefix, but not a > strategy. This list would currently contain "base, file, index, > one-file and tree".
Sounds a bit error prone, and could lead to unexpected results if/when someone creates a new command ('git merge status' anyone?) which is then suddenly treated as a merge strategy.
> 2) Require custom strategies to have a different naming scheme, like > if "foo" is a custom strategy, then it would have to be named > git-merge-custom-foo, _not_ git-merge-foo.
I think this is cleaner, what would be even nicer is to change the current names too, so name them all "git-merge-stragegy-foo".
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier