Re: [PATCH] "not uptodate" changed to "has local changes"
- From
- Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 17, 2008, 16:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0805170912w14b7894fxfebe15c14e4c44ef@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <e06498070805170744l7ad213aeqb779b0c0381e1de4@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com> wrote:
> With this dedication to backwards-compatibility, we'll be at Windows > Vista quality in no time.
I very much agree here, given the nature of scripts (that is, being very easy to update), I think we should try not to be too strict in backwards-compatibility or we'll lose the flexibility that is very much needed when developing a Good Product (tm) As long as such compatibility breaking changes are marked (in BIG LETTERS) in the changelog/release notes I think that would be a 'sacrifice' we should consider making.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier