Re: [PATCH 3/3] scalar: only warn when background maintenance fails

> Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes:
> 
>>>  The "maintain
>>> their clone" certainly should include running periodic maintenance
>>> tasks without them having to worry about it.  It feels like this is
>>> calling for an explicit "disable periodic maintenance tasks in this
>>> repository" option to help these esoteric environments that disable
>>> cron-like system services, while keeping the default safer,
>>> i.e. fail loudly when the periodic maintenance tasks that the users
>>> expect to happen cannot be enabled, or something.
>>>
>>> Perhaps I am not the primary audience, but hmph, I have a feeling
>>> that this is not exactly going into a healthy direction.
>>
>> Here, we are in an environment where background maintenance is
>> unavailable in an unexpected way. If that feature is not available
>> to the user, should they not get the benefits of the others?
> 
> That is not what I was saying.  I just have expected to see a way
> for the user to give scalar an explicit "I understand that periodic
> maintenance does not happen in this repository" consent, instead of
> demoting an error detection for everybody to a warning that users
> will just ignore.