Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Introduce the .gitfile
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 18, 2008, 14:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802181411300.30505@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <8c5c35580802180601h5cf01c5h583458fee61caa7a@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Feb 18, 2008 2:31 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote: > > > > > On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > In the case of patch "1/5 => 2/5", I would even have appreciated > > > > an interdiff... > > > > > > Sorry, but I don't think I understand what you mean by interdiff. > > > > The tool interdiff of patchutils is really nice: you can visualise > > what would be the diff between the state after applying the first > > patch, and the state after applying the second patch, without applying > > anything at all: > > > > $ interdiff <patch1> <patch2> > > Ok, that sounds useful (I was kind of confused since 'man interdiff' > gave me nothing: being on slackware I'm so spoiled with preinstalled > dev-tools that I see no point in consulting google ;). > > Something like this (possibly mangled by gmail)?
Heh, thank you! The mangling does not matter, since this is purely for reviewing pleasure.
Thanks, Dscho