From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:12:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Introduce the .gitfile
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802181411300.30505@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <8c5c35580802180601h5cf01c5h583458fee61caa7a@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote:

> On Feb 18, 2008 2:31 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > > In the case of patch "1/5 => 2/5", I would even have appreciated 
> > > > an interdiff...
> > >
> > > Sorry, but I don't think I understand what you mean by interdiff.
> >
> > The tool interdiff of patchutils is really nice: you can visualise 
> > what would be the diff between the state after applying the first 
> > patch, and the state after applying the second patch, without applying 
> > anything at all:
> >
> >         $ interdiff <patch1> <patch2>
> 
> Ok, that sounds useful (I was kind of confused since 'man interdiff' 
> gave me nothing: being on slackware I'm so spoiled with preinstalled 
> dev-tools that I see no point in consulting google ;).
> 
> Something like this (possibly mangled by gmail)?

Heh, thank you!  The mangling does not matter, since this is purely for 
reviewing pleasure.

Thanks,
Dscho