Re: [PATCH 1/3] http-push: avoid invalid memory accesses
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2008, 12:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802161211320.30505@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vabm1cqkd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 35 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > Before objects are sent, the respective ref is locked. However,
> > without this patch, the lock is lifted before the last object for
> > that ref was sent. As a consequence, the lock data was accessed
> > after the lock structure was free()d.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > http-push.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/http-push.c b/http-push.c
> > index b2b410d..7a6c669 100644
> > --- a/http-push.c
> > +++ b/http-push.c
> > @@ -2398,7 +2398,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > fill_active_slots();
> > add_fill_function(NULL, fill_active_slot);
> > #endif
> > - finish_all_active_slots();
> > + do {
> > + finish_all_active_slots();
> #ifdef CURL_MULTI
> > + fill_active_slots();
> #endif
> > + } while (request_queue_head && !aborted);
> >
> > /* Update the remote branch if all went well */
> > if (aborted || !update_remote(ref->new_sha1, ref_lock)) {
> > --
> > 1.5.4.1.1353.g0d5dd
>
> I wonder if we should define a no-op function fill_active_slots()
> for non MULTI case...Darn, darn, darn. Fixing the MULTI case was on my TODO list.
Ciao, Dscho