Re: [PATCH] prune: heed --expire for stale packs, add a test

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> >> Follow the same logic as for loose objects when removing stale packs: they
> >> might be in use (for example when fetching, or repacking in a cron job),
> >> so give the user a chance to say (via --expire) what is considered too
> >> young an age to die for stale packs.
> >> 
> >> Also add a simple test to verify that the stale packs are actually
> >> expired.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> >
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
> >
> > Nicolas
> 
> They are not "stale packs", but temporary files that wanted to
> become pack but did not succeed.  Perhaps "stale temporary
> packs"?
> 
> Shouldn't we do something similar to objects/pack/pack-*.temp
> files and objects/??/*.temp that http walker leaves?