Re: [PATCH] git-stash: alias 'list' to 'ls' and 'clear' to 'rm'

> El 5/2/2008, a las 12:20, Tim Stoakes escribió:
> 
> > Wincent Colaiuta(win@wincent.com)@050208-12:06:
> > > El 5/2/2008, a las 11:38, Tim Stoakes escribi?:
> > > 
> > > > clear::
> > > > +rm::
> > > > 	Remove all the stashed states. Note that those states will 
> > > >         then be subject to pruning, and may be difficult or 
> > > >         impossible to recover.
> > > 
> > > Isn't "rm" a bit misleading here? Seeing as the clear subcommand 
> > > really does an "rm -rf".
> > 
> > $ git stash clear foo
> > git stash clear with parameters is unimplemented
> > 
> > It appears that 'clear' is intended to behave like 'rm', however, it 
> > isn't implemented yet.
> 
> No, I don't think it was ever _intended_ to behave like rm. It does 
> pretty much what the man page says, clears all stashed states and that 
> was always its intention.
> 
> But lots of people have said that they'd like to be able to pop only to 
> topmost stash off the stack, or delete a specific stash, and some have 
> reported being caught by surprise and clearing all stashes when they 
> only wanted to delete one of them. There were patch(es) to the mailing 
> list a while back teaching "git reflog" to delete specific entries, and 
> seeing as "git stash" is built on top of reflogs the idea was that if 
> someone wants to implement a subcommand for deleting specific stashes 
> (or a push/pop kind of thing) then the reflog stuff would enable that. I 
> think the refog patch(es) was/were from Dscho. I can't remember who/if 
> has followed up with push/pop/delete patches for "git stash".