Re: git and binary files
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2008, 14:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0801161405330.17650@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0801161549140.5260@bender.nucleusys.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Petko Manolov wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > I think that you're missing the point of version control. It's not > > only about having an up-to-date source tree, but also about being able > > to go back to a certain revision. > > No contradiction here. In my case old source code will work perfectly > with new binaries/firmware. That's why i don't _need_ the history, only > the latest stuff in order to save space.
No, you _do_ miss the point here. You might _think_ that they work perfectly, but with revision control you want to have _exactly_ the same setup. You want to be able to go back to a certain _revision_ (including the then-current firmware).
And that's what you don't want. So git is not for you.
Ciao, Dscho