Re: git and binary files
- From
Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2008, 14:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <D3716EB3-10B1-4D96-AB12-BD86CBB189CB@wincent.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0801161549140.5260@bender.nucleusys.com>
El 16/1/2008, a las 14:58, Petko Manolov escribió:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> I think that you're missing the point of version control. It's not >> only about having an up-to-date source tree, but also about being >> able to go back to a certain revision. > > No contradiction here. In my case old source code will work > perfectly with new binaries/firmware. That's why i don't _need_ the > history, only the latest stuff in order to save space.
You may be interested in the history, but the entire purpose of any version control system (not just Git) is to record exactly that: history.
If the exact contents of these large binaries *really* don't matter, as you say they don't, than why don't you just commit one and never touch it again?
Cheers, Wincent