Re: Git-aware HTTP transport
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Aug 26, 2008, 17:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808261255570.1624@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808252052350.29665@asgard.lang.hm>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, david@lang.hm wrote:
> and for cloneing (and especially thing like linux-next where you essentially > re-clone daily) letting the pack get cached is probably a very good thing.
I hope that people recloning linux-next daily are very few. This is an incredible waste of bandwidth, regardless of the protocol used, dumb or not. A standard fetch with a remote tracking branch (with -f or with a plus sign on the "fetch" line in your config file) should be all that's needed to significantly reduce the amount of data needed to transfer.
Nicolas