Re: Git-aware HTTP transport
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:37 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>>
>> So this is what may be the final draft of the HTTP protocol.
>> I've added stuff about capability selection between the peers for
>> future expansion support. The upload-pack service has a better
>> use of it than receive-pack. Otherwise it is what I think you are
>> agreeing to above. ;-)
>>
>
> It looks good to me. I *really* like the option of combining a redirect
> with a refs list in one reply; this will make things substantially easier do
> deploy on kernel.org, and saves a round trip to boot.
I agree, this is a very cool feature of the protocol...
- Imran
Show 12 quoted lines
>
> Just an implementation detail for the server, however: for an *empty*
> repository (one which has no refs at all), the server needs to *not*
> transmit the redirect, or there will be a loop :) It is unnecessary,
> anyway, since there is inherently nothing to do.
>
> -hpa
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Imran M Yousuf
Entrepreneur & Software Engineer
Smart IT Engineering
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Email: imran@smartitengineering.com
Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/
Mobile: +880-1711402557
Imran M Yousuf <imyousuf@gmail.com>