Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2008, 18:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808231152250.3363@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080823181827.GA15993@atjola.homenet>
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > So, how would you make it less obscure and unobvious then the current > method? The current method would be: > > git fetch linux-next > git checkout linux-next/whatever > > Which seems neither obscure nor unobvious to me...
One thing that I admit we haven't done is _document_ this in some obvious place.
When you know git, it's really fairly obvious and straightforward. But for somebody who doesn't, then _all_ the documentation is really about well-maintained trees that don't rebase. We very much discourage rebasing, and none of the docs even really talk about how to handle it.
The linux-next tree in general is I think not as useful as people think it could be. _I_ think it's been sold as something much bigger and more useful than "it's a tree where you see conflicts early, but you can't actually really _use_ it for anything".
So part of it is not even necessarily about _git_ documentation, but about the documentation for some of the trees that use git, but that aren't really meant for others to then use.
Linus