Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?
- From
- Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2008, 16:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080823163638.GW23334@one.firstfloor.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <48AFD764.7010605@gnu.org>
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:24:52AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Exactly. Don't rebase. And don't base your development on somebody who > >> does. > > > > That's pretty much impossible in the current state of Linux development > > as far as I know. > > > >> Remember how I told you that you should never rebase? > > > > I suspect your recommendation does not match real world git use. > > I think if you have to rebase often, you're actually better off using
[ ] You read my original email.
The issue is not that I'm rebasing [1], but that other people I'm updating trees from are rebasing all the time. And Linus and the others can say "don't rebase" all the time -- that doesn't change the fact thato others are rebasing anyways. And git's support for dealing with that seems to be quite poor.
-Andi
[1] Ok I do it occasionally, but that's not the problem here, and I don't have a real user base for my trees and the branches I'm doing that on.