Re: q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2008, 18:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807231100310.4754@woody.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080723140441.GA9537@elte.hu>
Ahh, missed that somebody already suggested it.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > hm, it's very slow: > > $ time git branch --no-merged > [...] > > real 0m9.177s > user 0m9.027s > sys 0m0.129s > > when running it on tip/master: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
We can probably speed it up, but more importantly, even if we don't, it's slow _once_.
It's worth taking a 9s hit, if that means that you can then skip half of the merges entirely, and thus win half of the 53s cost.
But I'll look if there's a way to cut it down from 9s. I suspect it has to traverse the whole history to make 100% sure that something isn't merged, but even that should be faster than 9s.
Linus