Re: q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches?
- From
- Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2008, 14:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080723141456.GA13556@elte.hu>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080723140959.GB9537@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> Even assuming that the filesystem is sane, is my merge-cache > implementation semantically equivalent to a git-merge? One detail is > that i suspect it is not equivalent in the git-merge --no-ff case. > (but that is a not too interesting non-default case anyway)
actually, since --no-ff creates a merge commit and thus propagates the head sha1, this should work fine as well.
(besides the small detail that my script has $1 hardcoded so parameters are not properly passed onto.)
Ingo