Re: About git and the use of SHA-1
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2008, 17:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804291352120.23581@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <7f9d599f0804291048n2c706f3amdf159ffe86bdbc8@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Geoffrey Irving wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion: it would handwaving if I was saying git was insecure, > but I'm not. I'm saying that if or when SHA1 becomes vulnerable to collision > attacks, git will be insecure.
Right. And if or when that happens then we'll make Git secure again with a different hash. In the mean time there is low return for the effort involved.
Nicolas