From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:55:32 GMT Subject: Re: About git and the use of SHA-1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7f9d599f0804291048n2c706f3amdf159ffe86bdbc8@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Geoffrey Irving wrote: > Sorry for the confusion: it would handwaving if I was saying git was insecure, > but I'm not. I'm saying that if or when SHA1 becomes vulnerable to collision > attacks, git will be insecure. Right. And if or when that happens then we'll make Git secure again with a different hash. In the mean time there is low return for the effort involved. Nicolas