Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Oct 15, 2007, 20:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710151321560.6887@woody.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710152026260.25221@racer.site>
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Bash we can fix in the long run (this goes under the keyword > "builtinification" on the git list)
I thought busybox was being used for the core commands? Is ash not complete/usable enough (with all the fixes git has had for broken shells) to be used?
I do agree that perl looks unavoidable, but I thought the windows port already avoided at least bash. Not true?
(or is it just that even with ash, you end up hitting all the same issues with cygwin/msys?)
Linus