Re: Switching from CVS to GIT

From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Oct 15, 2007, 06:39 UTC
Message-ID: <47130B25.4010304@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <1773C6F0-87BE-4F3C-B68A-171E1F32E242@lrde.epita.fr>

Benoit SIGOURE schrieb:

Show 18 quoted lines

> Context: GNU make seems to be willing to switch from CVS to ... 
> something else.
> 
> On Oct 14, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> 
>> [...] the big thing no one else seems to have addressed much in
>> other discussions I've seen is portability.  It LOOKS like there are
>> native ports of GIT to MINGW, but I have no idea how complete and usable
>> they are.  If someone who has a Windows system could look into that it
>> would be a big help.
> 
> I think the best thing to do is to ask directly on the Git ML.
> 
> Someone already pointed out that he'd like to use Git on Windows but 
> doesn't want to install either Cygwin or MSYS.  Is this possible, or 
> will it be possible in the near future?  Is it possible to use one of 
> the various GUIs (git-gui, gitk, qgit) on Windows without requiring a 
> POSIXish shell etc.?

FWIW, I'm using the MinGW port from cmd.exe, i.e. not from a posix shell, on a *production* repository. gitk and git-gui work. Not all operations that I regularly use are available[*] via the GUIs, like git-rebase or non-fast-forwarding push, so the use of the command line is needed from time to time.

Unfortunately, "Fetch" does not yet work[*] from within git-gui, so you have to fall back to git-fetch on the command line.

Of course, the Posix toolset, including a shell, must still be installed (and in my setup they are in the PATH), but you don't have to use it.

[*] Note the distinction between "not available" and "does not work".

-- Hannes