Re: Understanding version 4 packs
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
> > Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
>
> >> BTW Shawn there is no need to store the number of tree records at the
> >> beginning of the tree object since that can be deduced directly from the
> >> object size stored in the object header.
> >
> > Doh. Yes, of course.
>
> But if it makes for easier _implementation_, perhaps it should stay...
No.
I don't think a division by 6 is that much of an implementation issue.
Nicolas