From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:01:08 GMT Subject: Re: Understanding version 4 packs Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > >> BTW Shawn there is no need to store the number of tree records at the > >> beginning of the tree object since that can be deduced directly from the > >> object size stored in the object header. > > > > Doh. Yes, of course. > > But if it makes for easier _implementation_, perhaps it should stay... No. I don't think a division by 6 is that much of an implementation issue. Nicolas