Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Mar 18, 2007, 02:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.0.83.0703172200060.18328@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703171854270.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > This is definitely an area where pack v4 will bring that cost down to > > zero. > > Heh. I believe that when I see it. The thing is, unless you re-generate > the tree object data structures, you'll have to have totally different > tree walkers for different tree types, and it will all be quite ugly and > complex. And "ugly and complex" seldom translates into "zero cost".
Well... in my opinion it is the _current_ tree walker that is quite ugly and complex. It is always messier to parse strings than fixed width binary fields.
Nicolas