Re: [PATCH 5/9] t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jun 8, 2017, 10:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.21.1.1706081221090.171564@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170607181553.GE110638@google.com>
Hi Brandon,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Brandon Williams wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On 06/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > We are about to change the way aliases are expanded, to use the early > > config machinery. > > > > This machinery reports errors in a slightly different manner than the > > cached config machinery. > > Not a comment on the patch but just a genuine question: Is there any > reason why they complain in a different way? Doesn't it make sense for > the errors to be reported consistently?
Yes, I agree that they should not complain in different ways.
I had a brief look to see whether I could quickly fix that "while at it". But it seems to be quite a bit more involved than I am comfortable slipping into this patch series (whose purpose is not to fix the dichotomy between direct and cached config parsing, after all).
Ciao, Dscho