Re: [PATCH 6.5?/8] version: move --build-options to a test helper
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 31, 2017, 15:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.21.1.1705311744170.3610@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170531153123.atl45b3kbfmqhnta@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Jeff King wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:27:21PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > My intent in putting it into the actual git binary was that it could > > > also be useful for collecting build-time knobs from users (who may be > > > using a binary package). Like: > > > > > > http://public-inbox.org/git/20160712035719.GA30281@sigill.intra.peff.net/ > > > > > > We haven't filled in that NEEDSWORK yet, but I'd rather see us go in > > > that direction than remove the option entirely. > > > > FWIW it also helped Git for Windows. > > > > The two additional bits we added to the build options (the commit from > > which Git was built and the architecture) did not hurt one bit, either. > > > > In other words, it would make my life a lot harder if --build-options were > > moved to a test helper that does not ship with the end product. > > Cool, I'm glad it has helped already. If you have further bits added to > the output, is it worth sending that patch upstream?
Yes, of course.
The day only has 24h though and I am still stuck with other things I try to contribute that seem to be requiring a lot more effort (mostly trying to make my case that there are certain coding paradigms I find too sloppy to put my name on) from my side to get accepted than I'd like.
So yeah, as soon as the queue drains a bit more, I have tons more patches ready to go upstream.
Ciao, Dscho