git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2017, #02; Mon, 6)

From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date
Feb 9, 2017, 12:29 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.DEB.2.20.1702091319350.3496@virtualbox>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqzihzymn3.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> * sf/putty-w-args (2017-02-01) 5 commits
>  - SQUASH???
>  - connect: Add the envvar GIT_SSH_VARIANT and ssh.variant config
>  - git_connect(): factor out SSH variant handling
>  - connect: rename tortoiseplink and putty variables
>  - connect: handle putty/plink also in GIT_SSH_COMMAND
> 
>  The command line options for ssh invocation needs to be tweaked for
>  some implementations of SSH (e.g. PuTTY plink wants "-P <port>"
>  while OpenSSH wants "-p <port>" to specify port to connect to), and
>  the variant was guessed when GIT_SSH environment variable is used
>  to specify it.  Extend the guess to the command specified by the
>  newer GIT_SSH_COMMAND and also core.sshcommand configuration
>  variable, and give an escape hatch for users to deal with
>  misdetected cases.
> 
>  Stalled?
>  cf. <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702012319460.3496@virtualbox>
The latest messages in that thread are
- your claim that you never said correctness is pused to a back seat (when
  an earlier, detailed mail listed four priorities of your patch review,
  none of which is said correctness, so I did not bother to answer), and
- my answer that suggested to take a break because the conversation turned
  less rational: I had to point out that your objection was not really
  valid in this case.

I now see that you added a SQUASH commit (that was news to me, thank you very much), and that you seem to still insist that the code should prepare for possible future changes in the config settings that may actually never materialize. (And that would have to be handled at a different point, as I had pointed out, so that suggested preparation would most likely not help at all.)

In short: unless I read any convincing argument in favor of said SQUASH commit, I will remain convinced that v3, as submitted, is actually the best way forward.

Thank you for your attention, Johannes

Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 10 of 17 in “What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2017, #02; Mon, 6)”
  1. Junio C HamanoFeb 6, 2017
  2. SZEDER GáborFeb 7, 2017
  3. Jacob KellerFeb 7, 2017
  4. Junio C HamanoFeb 7, 2017
  5. Stefan BellerFeb 9, 2017
  6. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2017
  7. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2017
  8. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2017
  9. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2017
  10. Johannes SchindelinFeb 9, 2017
  11. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2017
  12. Johannes SchindelinFeb 9, 2017
  13. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2017
  14. Johannes SchindelinFeb 9, 2017
  15. Michael HaggertyFeb 9, 2017
  16. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2017
  17. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.