Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] object_id part 4
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2016, 07:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606200853580.22630@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160619092448.GA12221@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> I think traditionally we've avoided struct assignment because some > ancient compilers didn't do it. But it's in C89, and I suspect it's > crept into the code base anyway over the years without anyone > complaining.
I fear that's my fault, at least partially, seeing as merge-recursive.c even *returns* structs (see 6d297f81; I plan to fix that as part of the cleaned-up am-3-merge-recursive-direct patch series).
Sorry, Dscho