Re: 0 bot for Git

> On 24 Apr 2016 08:19, "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Lars & Junio,
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > > Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the explanation. My intention was not to be offensive.
> > > > I was curious about your workflow and I was wondering if the
> > > > Travis CI integration could be useful for you in any way.
> > >
> > > Don't worry; I didn't feel offended.  The Travis stuff running on
> > > the branches at http://github.com/git/git would surely catch issues
> > > on MacOSX and/or around git-p4 (neither of which I test myself when
> > > merging to 'pu') before they hit 'next', and that is already helping
> > > us greatly.
> >
> > I agree that it helps to catch those Mac and P4 issues early.
> >
> > However, it is possible that bogus errors are reported that might not have
> > been introduced by the changes of the PR, and I find it relatively hard to
> > figure out the specifics. Take for example
> >
> >         https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/124767554
> >
> > It appears that t9824 fails with my interactive rebase work on MacOSX,
> > both Clang and GCC versions. I
> 
> That test is failing because git-lfs has changed its  output format and
> git-p4 had not yet been taught about this.
> 
> There's a patch from Lars to fix it -  see the mailing list for details.