Re: GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2016, 08:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601280913450.2964@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <C0429EC95C2F44528E2A1336FB7A2D98@PhilipOakley>
Hi Philip,
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Philip Oakley wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com> > > Jonathan Smith <Jonathan.Smith@fphcare.co.nz> writes: > > > > > It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't > > > considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used > > > in a commercial context or otherwise. > > I'm guessing here, but I suspect that while its 'pretty clear' to Jonathan, > that he has met others who aren't so clear or trusting, and it's that > distrustful community that would need convincing.
It is not so much distrust as something you could take to court, I guess, because an *authoritative* answer was asked for. Now, the question is a legal one, so it is pretty clear (;-)) to me that only a lawyer could give that answer.
Having said that, I know of plenty of companies storing their proprietary code in Git repositories, and I would guess that they cleared that with their lawyers first.
Jonathan, please do not take that as any indication that I try to give this answer: if you want an authoritative answer to your question, you really need to consider asking a lawyer.
Ciao, Dscho