Re: [PATCH] test-path-utils: use xsnprintf in favor of strcpy

> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > > This sort-of applies on top of js/dirname-basename, which is in next.
> > > Textually, it's fine, but that topic is based on v2.6.5, and xsnprintf
> > > was only added in the v2.7.0 cycle. The simplest thing is probably to
> > > wait for it to graduate to master, and then apply there as a new topic
> > > (if we do v2.6.6, it's OK for it not to have this patch).
> > > 
> > > I can hold and resend in a week or two if that's easier.
> > 
> > If you have a patch to make dirname/basename safer based on xsnprintf, I
> > would like to have that as soon as possible (next was rewound to 2.7.0,
> > no?)...
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean. `dirname/basename` themselves don't have any
> problems. It's only the `strcpy` in the test program that I wanted to
> fix.
> 
> If Junio wants to rebase js/dirname-basename on a more recent tip (say,
> current "master") as part of the rewind, this could be applied directly
> (or just squashed in).