Re: rebase vs rebase -i
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 4, 2010, 18:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1002041859000.4505@intel-tinevez-2-302>
- In-Reply-To
- <76718491002040914t12956bb2gbe21ae89f31cbc7f@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Jay Soffian wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > >> (Here I'm setting GIT_EDITOR=true just to demonstrate that I didn't > >> change the list of commits in the latter case.) > > > > You can get _exactly_ the same behavior if you use -m. > > Or rather, -p. ;-)
No. -p tries to preserve merges, and it will use git-rebase--interactive.sh for hysterical raisins.
I meant -m.
Ciao, Dscho