From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:00:04 GMT
Subject: Re: rebase vs rebase -i
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1002041859000.4505@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <76718491002040914t12956bb2gbe21ae89f31cbc7f@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Jay Soffian wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> >> (Here I'm setting GIT_EDITOR=true just to demonstrate that I didn't
> >> change the list of commits in the latter case.)
> >
> > You can get _exactly_ the same behavior if you use -m.
> 
> Or rather, -p. ;-)

No.  -p tries to preserve merges, and it will use 
git-rebase--interactive.sh for hysterical raisins.

I meant -m.

Ciao,
Dscho