Re: [PATCH] grep: --full-tree

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:52:11PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> So I think the posted patch alone without changing anything else would be
> >> the approach to give the most benefit with the least impact to existing
> >> users, at least for now.
> >
> > Yes, I meant to say in my original message but forgot to: I think
> > --full-tree is an important first step, no matter what happens next. It
> > gives people a way to do what they want without typing the right number
> > of ".."s, and it opens up --no-full-tree if the default changes later.
> >
> > But I do worry about it being a command-line option. You are asking the
> > user to remember to type --full-tree every time.
> 
> We could redefine get_pathspec() to treat a pathspec that begins with a
> slash to be anchored at the top,