Re: git-subtree: directory mismatch
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2009, 23:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0911260013550.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpr76uzju.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do remember some people didn't like -X<option> syntax but I don't > think there was any solid counterproposal to achieve a similar goal to > satisfy the need to pass arbitrary parameters to the merge strategy > backends.
I took exception to the awkward way to specify the option. A strong hint just how awkward -X<option> is: it is hard to implement using parse-options.
There is no real reason to do it properly, i.e. with an option --merge-option <option> or --backend-option <option> or -X <option> (even if "-X" is not really an expressive name, to be real honest).
BTW the same goes for -S<string>, but unfortunately, we have to keep it to maintain backwards compatibility.
Ciao, Dscho