Re: git-subtree: directory mismatch
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2009, 19:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <32541b130911251148v70a5dc77k9936881d0b382ec2@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7htexuxc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes: >> I've read through the thread (I do remember skimming it awhile ago) >> but can't find patches for the syntax actually under discussion. > > I very much prefer gmane threading when following discussion over all the > other mail archives, but this shows one thing I really dislike about it.
[...]
> Look at http://github.com/gitster/git/commits/jc/merge-theirs/
I also tried simply searching for things like 'git "-xsubtree"' in google, with no luck. But thanks for the link.
> and found this series in there. It applies to v1.6.0-rc0~245 (no, I won't > be rebasing this myself---I don't have time for that while preparing for > the pre-release feature freeze).
I did a test merge and it looks like a ton of conflicts, but they seem to be pretty understandable ones, at least. I don't mind doing the rebase and resubmitting the patches, since it's sure less work than figuring out how to do it from scratch myself. Some questions though:
- What was the reason this never got merged? What changes are needed to rectify that?
- Considering the earlier discussion, do we want to leave out the actual -Xtheirs feature and just have -Xours and -Xsubtree?
- If I rebase them and the changes turn out to be minimal, do they still need a signed-off-by Junio? (He obviously owns part of the copyright and has previously signed off, but he also won't have signed off the rebased patches verbatim, so I'm confused.)
Thanks,
Avery