Re: auto-merge after push?
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 11, 2009, 23:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0905120128510.27348@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090511211339.GD21045@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 May 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:18:06PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > The thing is, a merge can fail. And then you already need direct access > > > > to the working directory in question. > > > > > > > > If you were actually talking about fast-forward pushes (because you did > > > > the merge locally already), this might help you: > > > > > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110251 > > > > > > Sounds good. But it looks like this patch is unlikely to be merged, does > > > it not? > > > > Unlikely to be merged by Junio? Without success stories, certainly. > > > > But you can do the same as I did: run your local Git with that patch. I > > am actually growing fonder and fonder of denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead. > > It works beautifully here. > > > > Of course, I always know what I am doing. > > BTW, what exactly happens on conflict?
With this patch? The push is refused.
Ciao, Dscho