Re: auto-merge after push?
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 11, 2009, 23:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0905120127320.27348@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090511211215.GC21045@redhat.com>
Hi,
[assuming that you did not mean this mail to be private, I send the answer to the Git list...]
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 11 May 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:18:06PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > The thing is, a merge can fail. And then you already need direct access > > > > to the working directory in question. > > > > > > > > If you were actually talking about fast-forward pushes (because you did > > > > the merge locally already), this might help you: > > > > > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110251 > > > > > > Sounds good. But it looks like this patch is unlikely to be merged, does > > > it not? > > > > Unlikely to be merged by Junio? Without success stories, certainly. > > > > But you can do the same as I did: run your local Git with that patch. I > > am actually growing fonder and fonder of denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead. > > It works beautifully here. > > > > Of course, I always know what I am doing. > > > > Ciao, > > Dscho > > > > P.S.: :-) > > OK. Could you send me the patch pls? gmane doesn't seem to have a "send > to mail" coption.
It has. It is a hidden function by the bot known as "Johannes Schindelin", listening on git@vger.kernel.org for requests:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110251/raw
Ciao, Dscho