Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2009, #01; Tue, 03)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 3, 2009, 11:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903031141330.6399@intel-tinevez-2-302>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vprgzdlom.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> * js/clone-depth-local (Fri Feb 27 00:04:06 2009 -0800) 3 commits > . parse_options(): do not "increment" boolean > . clone: ignore --depth when cloning locally (implicitly --local) > . clone: do not ignore --no-local option > > Jeff had a good suggestion for this series but it was tripped by > a misfeature in parse_options().
If the issue is that you cannot discern between implicit --no-local and --no-local, maybe the solution is to start with option_local = 1.
> * ns/stash-keep (Thu Feb 12 06:25:14 2009 +0900) 1 commit > - stash: --keep option just saves > > Do we want to keep this one?
AFAIAC no.
I'd like a shorter way to say "git stash save --keep-index". But that's OT.
Ciao, Dscho