From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:11:07 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2009, #01; Tue, 03)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903031141330.6399@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <7vprgzdlom.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> * js/clone-depth-local (Fri Feb 27 00:04:06 2009 -0800) 3 commits
>  . parse_options(): do not "increment" boolean
>  . clone: ignore --depth when cloning locally (implicitly --local)
>  . clone: do not ignore --no-local option
> 
> Jeff had a good suggestion for this series but it was tripped by
> a misfeature in parse_options().

If the issue is that you cannot discern between implicit --no-local and 
--no-local, maybe the solution is to start with option_local = 1.

> * ns/stash-keep (Thu Feb 12 06:25:14 2009 +0900) 1 commit
>  - stash: --keep option just saves
> 
> Do we want to keep this one?

AFAIAC no.

I'd like a shorter way to say "git stash save --keep-index".  But that's 
OT.

Ciao,
Dscho