Re: [PATCH 1/2] fsck: HEAD is part of refs
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2009, 16:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901301746370.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7veiylb1in.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> By default we looked at all refs but not HEAD. The only thing that > made fsck not lose sight of comments that are only reachable from a > detached HEAD was the reflog for the HEAD.
When fixing the revision machinery to imply HEAD with --all, I thought of fsck, too, but forgot to check if it does actually use the revision walker.
Sorry about this, Dscho