Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add submodule-support to git archive
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 25, 2009, 23:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901260024140.14855@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <8c5c35580901251512q5058dde3rdfae81979c46c36a@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Lars Hjemli wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 21:35, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > > Could we switch to incremental refinements once a series hits next, > > pretty please? > > The problem in this particular case is that the design has changed so > much since the first iteration that we're not really talking about > incremental refinements but rather a different approach to the same > problem. > > If you want me to build on top of the series in next anyways, would it > be acceptable if the first patch on top of ee306d2d59 reverts the > previous attempt? I think the rest of the series will be easier to > review that way.
I'd appreciate that.
Since 'next' will be rewound eventually, that first iteration and the revert will disappear at some stage.
Ciao, Dscho