From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:25:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add submodule-support to git archive
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901260024140.14855@racer>
In-Reply-To: <8c5c35580901251512q5058dde3rdfae81979c46c36a@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Lars Hjemli wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 21:35, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> > Could we switch to incremental refinements once a series hits next, 
> > pretty please?
> 
> The problem in this particular case is that the design has changed so 
> much since the first iteration that we're not really talking about 
> incremental refinements but rather a different approach to the same 
> problem.
> 
> If you want me to build on top of the series in next anyways, would it
> be acceptable if the first patch on top of ee306d2d59 reverts the
> previous attempt? I think the rest of the series will be easier to
> review that way.

I'd appreciate that.

Since 'next' will be rewound eventually, that first iteration and the 
revert will disappear at some stage.

Ciao,
Dscho